Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Spain is Insignificant?

I was sitting at my desk taking a short break from my university course thinking about a particular video game I'm currently interested in. The game is called Civilization III a very interesting game. The game includes 16 different civilizations and a number of events from recorded history. Obviously, it is far from historically accurate being a video game but it includes a civilopedia, which not only tells how certain thing function in the game, it also gives an abbreviated account of its roll in history.

I was a little upset because I had decided which people to lead; I had decided to lead the Spanish empire, only to discover that the game did not include Spain! A little miffed I mentioned it to Ted sitting on the couch. He said, something along the lines of not having a significant leader in their history. (each nation is portrayed by a "portrait" of a significant historical figure i.e. Cleopatra.)
We spent the entire day arguing about it. It only recently ended with me calling him ignorant to world history, and him calling me a nitpicky video game nerd.

My basic point was that the game was lacking one of the most important nations in the history of the world! Had Spain not funded Christopher Columbus we might not exist in life as we know it today.
Oh, in response to Ted's challenge to finding a historically significant figure for Spain, Philip II.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Forgot how to leave comments. Cortez, as Diana Waring describes him, has to win the Spanish leader of distinction award, hands down. Remember all the things he did in Mexico?